Last I heard they were working on optimising the web-interface in particular in the current development releases. The thin client is a little better at handling the big amount of data and you can stretch it a bit longer when switching away from the web-interface to the thin client but it's just postponing the inevitable. Your browser needs to parse this and display it via javascript which can be a CPU consuming process as well. I just checked and with just 300 torrents this data is already 250KB, every second. Either your local machine or your server might not be able to encrypt file transfer stream at the same speed, your connection is able to transfer it. I can connect just fine using WinSCP or FileZilla, but I cant see the SD card, or at least, I dont know where to find it. Ive had no luck with Warpinator (computers dont see each others). Cyberduck is an open source tool with 752 GitHub stars and 93 GitHub forks. Is there a way to transfer file from my PC to the Decks SD card. Edit any file with your preferred editor. On the other hand, Cyberduck provides the following key features: Easy to use interface. ![]() ![]() Every second the daemon present the web-interface with a big blob of data that contains everything that is happening which each torrent. Advertisement CPU When using SSH or TLS/SSL, file transfers in WinSCP are encrypted and encryption is CPU intensive. Some of the features offered by FileZilla are: Easy to use. This communication happens over an JSON-RPC interface. When you connect to the Deluge web-interface it communicates with the Deluge daemon (the one who does the actual work) about what's happening inside the client. Deluge's biggest problem is interface performance, not actual torrent performance when going over a certain amount of files.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |